U.S. President Donald Trump prepares to announce an agreement with British Prime Minister Keir Starmer (not pictured) between the two countries, at Chequers at the conclusion of a state visit on Sept. 18, 2025 in Aylesbury, Britain.
Leon Neal | Via Reuters
A federal judge in Tampa, Florida, on Friday struck President Donald Trump’s $15 billion defamation lawsuit against The New York Times as “decidedly improper and impermissible,” but will allow Trump to refile a much shorter and less florid amended civil complaint within the next month.
Judge Steven Merryday criticized Trump’s lengthy lawsuit — which accuses the Times of being a “mouthpiece” for the Democratic Party — for being way too long on praise for the president and “superfluous allegations.”
Merryday noted that the suit, which was only filed Monday, “consumes” 85 pages, and that Trump’s two civil counts against the newspaper are only detailed in the last few pages, after many, many pages of fulminating about Trump’s foes and boasting of his accomplishments.
“As every lawyer knows (or is presumed to know), a complaint is not a public forum for vituperation and invective — not a protected platform to rage against an adversary,” Merryday wrote.
“A complaint is not a megaphone for public relations or a podium for a passionate oration at a political rally or the functional equivalent of the Hyde Park Speakers’ Corner,” the judge said, referring to London’s famed free-speech haven.
Merryday gave Trump and his lawyers 28 days to file an amended lawsuit against the Times.
But he warned them not to make it longer than 40 pages, “excluding only the caption, the signature, and any attachment.”
“This action will begin, will continue, and will end in accord with the rules of procedure and in a professional and dignified manner,” the judge wrote.
A spokesman for Trump’s legal team, in a statement to CNBC about the judge’s order, said, “President Trump will continue to hold the Fake News accountable through this powerhouse lawsuit against the New York Times, its reporters, and Penguin Random House, in accordance with the judge’s direction on logistics.”
A spokesperson for The Times earlier this week said that Trump’s suit “lacks any legitimate legal claims and instead is an attempt to stifle and discourage independent reporting.”
“The New York Times will not be deterred by intimidation tactics,” that spokesperson said.
“We will continue to pursue the facts without fear or favor and stand up for journalists’ First Amendment right to ask questions on behalf of the American people.”
This is breaking news. Please refresh for updates.
