Close Menu

    Subscribe to Updates

    Get the latest creative news from FooBar about art, design and business.

    What's Hot

    2025 Giants game-by-game predictions: All gasps, no breaks … and lots of pain

    Surprise, your original HomePod isn’t obsolete yet

    New HKU5-CoV-2 virus found in China just step away from causing pandemic

    Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
    Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram Pinterest VKontakte
    Sg Latest NewsSg Latest News
    • Home
    • Politics
    • Business
    • Technology
    • Entertainment
    • Health
    • Sports
    Sg Latest NewsSg Latest News
    Home»Business»Trump administration fast-tracks oil and mining projects, angering environmentalists
    Business

    Trump administration fast-tracks oil and mining projects, angering environmentalists

    AdminBy AdminNo Comments5 Mins Read
    Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr Email
    Share
    Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Pinterest Email


    The Trump administration said it will accelerate permit approvals for mining, drilling and fossil fuel production and transportation on public land, fast-tracking a review process that would normally take years. 

    In announcing the emergency procedures Wednesday, the Department of the Interior, which oversees the management of federal lands and natural resources, said the permitting process will now take up to “28 days at most” — a drastic departure from the current one- to two-year timeline. 

    The government agency said the move is in response to President Trump’s January 20 declaration of a national energy emergency. In an executive order on the first day of his second term, the White House said it would “eliminate harmful, coercive ‘climate’ policies that increase the costs of food and fuel.”

    The speedy permitting policy opens the door for the U.S. to expand oil and gas projects and for Mr. Trump to make good on his promise to “Drill, baby, drill” — a common refrain on his campaign trail. The new guidelines will apply to a wide range of energy projects, including crude oil, natural gas and coal.

    The U.S. leads the world in oil and gas production, with an output of 20 million barrels of oil a day and accounting for roughly a quarter of global gas production, according to the International Energy Agency.

    The DOI said it would use emergency authorities under the National Environmental Policy Act, Endangered Species Act and the National Historic Preservation Act to expedite the permitting process.

    “The United States cannot afford to wait,” Secretary of the Interior Doug Burgum said in a statement on Wednesday. “President Trump has made it clear that our energy security is national security, and these emergency procedures reflect our unwavering commitment to protecting both.”

    Lawsuits to come, experts say

    Environmental advocates rebuked the announcement, saying that in addition to adverse environmental impacts on public land and water sources, the expedited procedures will strip away community members’ ability to weigh in on projects happening in their own backyards. Experts say the move is expected to draw legal challenges.

    “What they’re proposing to do is basically forgo environmental review or public participation or anything meaningful,” said Michael Burger, executive director of the Sabin Center for Climate Change Law at Columbia University. “The implications of that are extreme.”

    The environmental review process has developed over time, he said, and goes back decades. The Endangered Species Act, one of three statues the DOI is targeting, was signed into law by President Richard Nixon in 1973. Section 7 of the Act requires consultation among agencies “to ensure their activities are not likely to jeopardize the continued existence” of federally protected species, according to the U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service.

    A win for oil and gas industries

    The announcement on Wednesday was a win for the American Petroleum Institute, the oil and gas industry’s largest lobbying group, which has cheered Mr. Trump’s energy agenda. 

    “Our nation’s permitting system is broken, and reform is essential to ensuring access to affordable, reliable energy,” Holly Hopkins, VP of upstream policy at the American Petroleum Institute, said in an email to CBS MoneyWatch.

    Former officials from several different federal agencies who served under Mr. Trump’s previous term and the Biden administration have told CBS News on background that looming workforce reductions could throw a wrench in the department’s plans to speed up the permitting process. Also, breaking with long-standing practices could lead to major slipups, such as oil spills, they added. 

    The Department of the Interior employs about 70,000 staff members, according to its website. But cuts could be on the horizon. An internal White House document obtained by The Washington Post indicated that as many as 1 in 4 department employees could be let go as a part of a broader series of staff cuts across government agencies. 

    “How can you accomplish so much with fewer and fewer people?” said Burger of Columbia’s Sabin Center. “The only result is less and less oversight.”

    Athan Manuel, director of the Lands Protection Program at the Sierra Club, agreed, adding that gutting the federal agency could hinder the Trump administration’s objectives. 

    “They just don’t seem to understand that these employees run the gamut from wildlife biologists to firefighters, to people who permit oil and gas drilling or permit mines on federal lands,” he said. “If it’s going to wholesale cut staff, some of the things they care about are going to get caught up in that.”

    The Department of Interior did not respond to request for comment on how layoffs might impact its ability to issue permits on a tighter timetable.

    According to the new procedural guidelines issued by the agency this week, companies seeking a permit are required to confirm in writing that they want their project covered by the expedited process — meaning that not everyone will necessarily opt in. Those that do could stand to lose big, Manuel said.

    “Companies are very cautious before they sink millions of dollars into a well or to a mining project,” he said. “So I think they benefit from going slowly because they don’t want to be stuck with a stranded asset or literally drill a dry hole here.” 

    ClimateWatch: Climate Change News & Features

    More

    More

    Mary Cunningham

    Mary Cunningham is a reporter for CBS MoneyWatch. Before joining the business and finance vertical, she worked at “60 Minutes”, CBSNews.com, and CBS News 24/7 as part of the CBS News Associate Program.



    Source link

    Share. Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr Email
    Admin
    • Website

    Related Posts

    Romancing the ruby – CBS News

    Ashley’s Frasers explores bid for ailing Revolution Beauty | Money News

    Midea recalls 1.7 million air conditioners over potential mold risk

    Sias calls for Singapore Paincare shareholders to await IFA opinion on privatisation offer

    Add A Comment
    Leave A Reply Cancel Reply

    Editors Picks

    Microsoft’s Singapore office neither confirms nor denies local layoffs following global job cuts announcement

    Google reveals “material 3 expressive” design – Research Snipers

    Trump’s fast-tracked deal for a copper mine heightens existential fight for Apache

    Top Reviews
    9.1

    Review: Mi 10 Mobile with Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 Mobile Platform

    By Admin
    8.9

    Comparison of Mobile Phone Providers: 4G Connectivity & Speed

    By Admin
    8.9

    Which LED Lights for Nail Salon Safe? Comparison of Major Brands

    By Admin
    Sg Latest News
    Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram Pinterest Vimeo YouTube
    • Get In Touch
    © 2025 SglatestNews. All rights reserved.

    Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.