Close Menu

    Subscribe to Updates

    Get the latest creative news from FooBar about art, design and business.

    What's Hot

    Should Tyrese Haliburton play through his calf injury? | First Things First

    Tariffs hit US economy forecast but the Fed unmoved by latest Trump threats with no change to interest rates | Money News

    Pato O’Ward Leading Arrow McLaren Charge But Still Work To Be Done

    Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
    Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram Pinterest VKontakte
    Sg Latest NewsSg Latest News
    • Home
    • Politics
    • Business
    • Technology
    • Entertainment
    • Health
    • Sports
    Sg Latest NewsSg Latest News
    Home»Politics»Supreme Court upholds Tennessee law restricting gender-affirming care for transgender minors
    Politics

    Supreme Court upholds Tennessee law restricting gender-affirming care for transgender minors

    AdminBy AdminNo Comments4 Mins Read
    Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr Email
    Share
    Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Pinterest Email


    Washington — The Supreme Court on Wednesday upheld a Tennessee law that restricts access to gender-affirming care for minors experiencing gender dysphoria, clearing the way for the medical treatments for transgender youth to be limited in half of the country.

    The high court ruled 6-3 in rejecting the challenge from the Biden administration, three families and a physician who had argued that Tennessee’s law violated the Constitution’s guarantee of equal protection under the law. The court concluded that the state’s measure, enacted in 2023, does not run afoul of the 14th Amendment.

    “Our role is not ‘to judge the wisdom, fairness, or logic’ of the law before us, but only to ensure that it does not violate the equal protection guarantee of the Fourteenth Amendment. Having concluded it does not, we leave questions regarding its policy to the people, their elected representatives, and the democratic process,” Chief Justice John Roberts wrote.

    The court’s majority found that Tennessee’s law is not subject to a heightened level of judicial and satisfies the most deferential standard, known as rational basis.

    The three liberal justices, Sonia Sotomayor, Elena Kagan and Ketanji Brown Jackson, were in dissent. Sotomayor read her dissent from the bench.

    The Tennessee law

    Tennessee’s law prohibits medical treatments like puberty blockers or hormone therapy for transgender adolescents under the age of 18. The state is one of 25 with laws that seek to restrict access to gender-affirming care for young people diagnosed with gender dysphoria.

    The case, U.S. v. Skrmetti, marked the first in which the Supreme Court stepped into the politically charged debate over health care for transgender youth. In addition to the state prohibitions, President Trump has issued executive orders that address what he calls “gender ideology.” One declares that it is the federal government’s policy to recognize “two sexes, male and the female,” and the second threatens federal funding for medical institutions that offer gender-affirming care to young people under the age of 18.

    Mr. Trump’s proposals are being challenged in the federal courts.

    Known as SB1, Tennessee’s law prevents health care providers from administering puberty blockers or hormone therapy if they’re meant to enable “a minor to identify with, or live as, a purported identity inconsistent with the minor’s sex.” The state had argued that it has a “compelling interest in encouraging minors to appreciate their sex, particularly as they undergo puberty,” and in barring treatments that “might encourage minors to become disdainful of their sex.” 

    Shortly before the law took effect, three families with transgender children and a physician who provides the treatments to patients with gender dysphoria challenged the ban in federal court, arguing it is unconstitutional. The Biden administration then intervened in the case. 

    A federal district court blocked the law, finding that it discriminates based on sex and transgender status. A divided panel of judges on the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 6th Circuit then reversed that decision and allowed Tennessee’s ban to take effect while legal proceedings continued.

    The appeals court evaluated the law under rational-basis review, the most deferential of the tiers of judicial scrutiny. But the Biden administration and the families had argued Tennessee’s ban should be subject to a more stringent level of review, known as heightened scrutiny, because it draws lines based on sex and discriminates based on transgender status.

    But Tennessee had argued that the state aims to protect young people from the consequences of the medical treatments, which it said are risky and unproven. The state said it was setting age- and use-based limits on medical care and exercising its authority to regulate medicine.

    Access to gender-affirming care has become a flashpoint in the culture wars, as half of the states have in recent years enacted laws that limit the availability of the medical interventions. Many of those same states have also enacted measures prohibiting transgender athletes from competing in women’s sports.

    The U.S. Supreme Court

    More

    Melissa Quinn

    Melissa Quinn is a politics reporter for CBSNews.com. She has written for outlets including the Washington Examiner, Daily Signal and Alexandria Times. Melissa covers U.S. politics, with a focus on the Supreme Court and federal courts.

    Share. Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr Email
    Admin
    • Website

    Related Posts

    Nippon Steel’s purchase of US Steel closes, with big role for Trump

    Welfare cuts vote could be the government’s biggest parliamentary test to date | Politics News

    Stocks choppy as Fed leans hawkish, oil climbs on Mideast uncertainty

    Trump says no decision yet on U.S. joining Israel’s attacks on Iran, after Iran warns it would risk “all-out war”

    Add A Comment
    Leave A Reply Cancel Reply

    Editors Picks

    Microsoft’s Singapore office neither confirms nor denies local layoffs following global job cuts announcement

    Google reveals “material 3 expressive” design – Research Snipers

    Trump’s fast-tracked deal for a copper mine heightens existential fight for Apache

    Top Reviews
    9.1

    Review: Mi 10 Mobile with Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 Mobile Platform

    By Admin
    8.9

    Review: Xiaomi’s New Loudspeakers for Hi-fi and Home Cinema Systems

    By Admin
    8.9

    Comparison of Mobile Phone Providers: 4G Connectivity & Speed

    By Admin
    Sg Latest News
    Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram Pinterest Vimeo YouTube
    • Get In Touch
    © 2025 SglatestNews. All rights reserved.

    Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.