Close Menu

    Subscribe to Updates

    Get the latest creative news from FooBar about art, design and business.

    What's Hot

    US weekly jobless claims fall, but still elevated

    How Fast Can a Kidney Infection Kill You? Here’s the Truth

    Texas Instruments plans to invest over $60 billion in US to make foundational chips

    Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
    Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram Pinterest VKontakte
    Sg Latest NewsSg Latest News
    • Home
    • Politics
    • Business
    • Technology
    • Entertainment
    • Health
    • Sports
    Sg Latest NewsSg Latest News
    Home»Health»PROVISION Study Which Met Its Primary Endpoint Now Demonstrates Similar Clinical Outcomes for FFRangio and FFR
    Health

    PROVISION Study Which Met Its Primary Endpoint Now Demonstrates Similar Clinical Outcomes for FFRangio and FFR

    AdminBy AdminNo Comments3 Mins Read
    Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr Email
    Share
    Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Pinterest Email


    PROVISION Study, Prospective Randomized Trial Evaluating Clinical Outcomes of FFRangio Versus FFR Guidance, Demonstrates Similar MACE Rates at One Year

    PARIS, May 22, 2025 /PRNewswire/ — Today at the annual EuroPCR conference taking place in Paris, France, Dr. Toru Tanigaki of Gifu Heart Center in Gifu, Japan presented the one-year results of the physician-initiated PROVISION1 Study. At TCT 2024, investigators shared that the PROVISION Study met its non-inferiority primary endpoint and revealed economic and resource utilization advantages for the FFRangio technology over traditional invasive FFR.




    PROVISION Study Which Met Its Primary Endpoint Now Demonstrates Similar Clinical Outcomes for FFRangio and FFR.






    PROVISION Study Which Met Its Primary Endpoint Now Demonstrates Similar Clinical Outcomes for FFRangio and FFR.

    The PROVISION Study is the first Japanese prospective randomized controlled trial (RCT) comparing the outcomes of an angio-based technology compared to invasive wire-based physiology and enrolled 401 patients across 13 centers in Japan. Patients with intermediate coronary lesions (30-90% diameter stenosis) were randomized 1:1 to either the wire-based FFR arm, in which the treatment decision was determined based on FFR values obtained using an invasive pressure wire, or the FFRangio arm, in which the treatment decision was based on FFRangio values. Based on the functional evaluations, either revascularization (PCI) and optimal medical management (OMT) or OMT alone were selected, and patients were followed clinically for at least one year.

    During a Hotline / Late-Breaking Trials session at EuroPCR 2025, Dr. Tanigaki presented the rates of major adverse cardiac events (MACE) at one year for patients treated according to FFRangio guidance versus FFR guidance. MACE was defined as a composite of death from any cause, nonfatal myocardial infarction (MI) or unplanned revascularization. MACE at one year was 9.9% for the FFRangio arm versus 12.6% for the FFR arm [HR 0.80 (0.42 to 1.51), p = 0.489]. MACE excluding periprocedural MI was 3.5% for the FFRangio arm versus 6.0% for the FFR arm [HR 0.58 (0.13 to 1.42), p = 0.167]. The rates of all-cause death, myocardial infarction and target vessel revascularization at one year were all similar in the FFRangio arm and FFR arm.

     “The CathWorks FFRangio® System has already demonstrated the highest diagnostic accuracy compared to wire-based FFR among non-hyperemic indices and angio-based technologies. The FFRangio System not only eliminates the drawbacks of invasive wire-based technologies that have limited the overall adoption of physiology but also provides tools that optimize clinical decision making. With the addition of this new body of clinical evidence demonstrating patients treated according to FFRangio guidance have similar outcomes to those treated based on invasive FFR guidance while potentially reducing procedural resources and costs, we are truly embarking on a new era in physiology, transforming FFRangio into the new standard of care,” said Ramin Mousavi, CathWorks President & CEO.

    ABOUT CATHWORKS

    CathWorks is the leader in digital health innovations that can improve the lives of patients globally. The CathWorks FFRangio® System combines artificial intelligence and advanced computational science, transforming how cardiovascular disease is diagnosed and treated. The FFRangio System obtains physiologic information from routine angiograms, eliminating the need for drug stimulation and invasive pressure wires. It provides physicians with quick and reliable intraprocedural FFRangio values for the entire coronary tree. For more information on CathWorks, visit www.cath.works and follow @CathWorks on LinkedIn. 

    1.

    Prospective Randomized trial of clinical Outcomes of angiography-based fractional flow reserve guidance Versus wIre-baSed fractIOnal flow reserve guidance (PROVISION) study is an investigation of the Utility of Coronary Angiography (FFRangio) in Comparison to Coronary Fractional Flow Reserve (FFR) in the Determination of Treatment Planning and the Clinical Prognosis in Patients with Chronic Phase Coronary Artery Disease

    Investors:
    Mike Feher
    [email protected]

    Media:
    Sarita Monico
    [email protected]

    SOURCE CathWorks



    Share. Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr Email
    Admin
    • Website

    Related Posts

    How Fast Can a Kidney Infection Kill You? Here’s the Truth

    Hoth Therapeutics Reports Positive Preclinical Safety Data for Cancer Fighting HT-KIT — Dose-Dependent Liver Activity with No Observed Toxicity Supports IND Pathway

    8 Supplements to Avoid if You Have High Blood Pressure

    A Bacterial Sexually Transmitted Infection (STI)

    Add A Comment
    Leave A Reply Cancel Reply

    Editors Picks

    Microsoft’s Singapore office neither confirms nor denies local layoffs following global job cuts announcement

    Google reveals “material 3 expressive” design – Research Snipers

    Trump’s fast-tracked deal for a copper mine heightens existential fight for Apache

    Top Reviews
    9.1

    Review: Mi 10 Mobile with Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 Mobile Platform

    By Admin
    8.9

    Comparison of Mobile Phone Providers: 4G Connectivity & Speed

    By Admin
    8.9

    Which LED Lights for Nail Salon Safe? Comparison of Major Brands

    By Admin
    Sg Latest News
    Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram Pinterest Vimeo YouTube
    • Get In Touch
    © 2025 SglatestNews. All rights reserved.

    Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.