Close Menu

    Subscribe to Updates

    Get the latest creative news from FooBar about art, design and business.

    What's Hot

    Connor Zilisch, Dale Earnhardt Jr. and more post-race interviews from Pocono | NASCAR on FOX

    Understanding Marijuana Withdrawal and Detox: What to Expect and How to Navigate Recovery

    Dodgers respond to ICE raids in Los Angeles

    Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
    Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram Pinterest VKontakte
    Sg Latest NewsSg Latest News
    • Home
    • Politics
    • Business
    • Technology
    • Entertainment
    • Health
    • Sports
    Sg Latest NewsSg Latest News
    Home»Politics»Judge blocks Trump administration’s science research funding cuts
    Politics

    Judge blocks Trump administration’s science research funding cuts

    AdminBy AdminNo Comments2 Mins Read
    Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr Email
    Share
    Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Pinterest Email


    BOSTON — A federal judge has blocked President Donald Trump ‘s administration from making drastic cuts to research funding provided by the National Science Foundation.

    U.S. District Judge Indira Talwani in Boston struck down on Friday a policy change that could have stripped universities of tens of millions of dollars in research funding. The universities argued the move threatened critical work in artificial intelligence, cybersecurity, semiconductors and other technology fields.

    Talwani said the change, announced by the NSF in May, was arbitrary and capricious and contrary to law.

    An email Saturday to the NSF was not immediately returned.

    At issue are “indirect” costs, expenses such as building maintenance and computer systems that aren’t linked directly to a specific project. Currently, the NSF determines each grant recipient’s indirect costs individually and is supposed to cover actual expenses.

    The Trump administration has dismissed indirect expenses as “overhead” and capped them for future awards by the NSF to universities at 15 % of the funding for direct research costs.

    The University of California, one of the plaintiffs, estimated the change would cost it just under $100 million a year.

    Judges have blocked similar caps that the Trump administration placed on grants by the Energy Department and the National Institutes of Health.

    Share. Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr Email
    Admin
    • Website

    Related Posts

    Dodgers respond to ICE raids in Los Angeles

    Republican Party has nearly five times more cash on hand than the Democrats

    Palestine Action: The ‘enemy within’ or non-violent protesters? | UK News

    Trump spending bill food stamp plan

    Add A Comment
    Leave A Reply Cancel Reply

    Editors Picks

    Microsoft’s Singapore office neither confirms nor denies local layoffs following global job cuts announcement

    Google reveals “material 3 expressive” design – Research Snipers

    Trump’s fast-tracked deal for a copper mine heightens existential fight for Apache

    Top Reviews
    9.1

    Review: Mi 10 Mobile with Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 Mobile Platform

    By Admin
    8.9

    Comparison of Mobile Phone Providers: 4G Connectivity & Speed

    By Admin
    8.9

    Which LED Lights for Nail Salon Safe? Comparison of Major Brands

    By Admin
    Sg Latest News
    Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram Pinterest Vimeo YouTube
    • Get In Touch
    © 2025 SglatestNews. All rights reserved.

    Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.